)]}'
{
  "log": [
    {
      "commit": "a201e83e59562e0e662196a616ff746cdaddd74e",
      "tree": "bebd570c3098f8793d9d6f3442bbb50433374917",
      "parents": [
        "bac648b8fc06dfffaf67cf283f73fa2572e67575"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Matthias Andreas Benkard",
        "email": "code@mail.matthias.benkard.de",
        "time": "Sun Aug 02 19:45:34 2026 +0200"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Matthias Andreas Benkard",
        "email": "code@mail.matthias.benkard.de",
        "time": "Sun Aug 02 19:45:34 2026 +0200"
      },
      "message": "Close the NRW issue: 17. RÄStV-AusfG as a fourth acceptance case\n\nArticle 4 of the 22nd Broadcasting Amendment Act recasts § 1 of the act\nimplementing the 17th Broadcasting Amendment Treaty. Both the pre- and\nthe post-amendment consolidated version are served by recht.nrw.de, so\nthis closes the last open article of GV. NRW. 7/2026.\n\nNo production code needed changing: the article carries its single\ncommand without an enumeration item, and the recast quote contains\nnested quotation marks — both are already handled. The result matches\nthe official version of 1 April 2026 character for character, including\nits editorial placeholders.\n\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 \u003cnoreply@anthropic.com\u003e\nChange-Id: If63606d113f2801f0c9e82350215443da8e8be8b\n"
    }
  ]
}